Compare commits

..

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
f32c529a36 결제 전환 목표 아키텍처 정의 (1/2) (1/2) (SPRING-ARC-REF-FINAL-1783833422)
All checks were successful
ci / test (pull_request) Successful in 7s
2026-07-12 05:22:27 +00:00
5833efd426 forge: open work branch for SPRING-ARC-REF-FINAL-1783833422-attempt-3 2026-07-12 05:22:16 +00:00
2 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
# SPRING-ARC-REF-FINAL-1783833422-attempt-3
Forge 이슈 작업 브랜치 `forge/SPRING-ARC-REF-FINAL-1783833422-attempt-3`.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# Architecture Decision Record: Payment Boundary
## Context
In order to define our payment processing system, we need to establish clear boundaries between different components that handle payments. This includes services responsible for payment requests, notifications, and reconciliation.
## Decision
We will implement a microservices architecture where each payment-related functionality is managed by a separate service. This allows for better scalability and maintainability. The main services will include:
- Payment Service: Handles payment transactions.
- Notification Service: Sends notifications upon payment success or failure.
- Reconciliation Service: Ensures the integrity of payments across systems.
Additionally, we will enforce communication through a RESTful API approach and use message queues for asynchronous operations between services.
## Alternatives
1. **Monolithic Architecture**: This was considered but rejected due to scaling limitations.
2. **Serverless Functions**: While appealing, the complexity of maintaining state and handling different payment types favored a microservices approach.
## Consequences
Choosing a microservices architecture will introduce operational overhead but it enables us to scale individual components as needed. It accommodates future integrations with third-party payment providers and allows teams to work independently on their respective services without impacting others.