.forge/SPRING-ARC-REF-FINAL-1783833422-attempt-3.md

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-# SPRING-ARC-REF-FINAL-1783833422-attempt-3
-
-Forge 이슈 작업 브랜치 `forge/SPRING-ARC-REF-FINAL-1783833422-attempt-3`.

docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-# Architecture Decision Record: Payment Boundary
-
-## Context
-In order to define our payment processing system, we need to establish clear boundaries between different components that handle payments. This includes services responsible for payment requests, notifications, and reconciliation.
-
-## Decision
-We will implement a microservices architecture where each payment-related functionality is managed by a separate service. This allows for better scalability and maintainability. The main services will include:
-- Payment Service: Handles payment transactions.
-- Notification Service: Sends notifications upon payment success or failure.
-- Reconciliation Service: Ensures the integrity of payments across systems.
-
-Additionally, we will enforce communication through a RESTful API approach and use message queues for asynchronous operations between services.
-
-## Alternatives
-1. **Monolithic Architecture**: This was considered but rejected due to scaling limitations.
-2. **Serverless Functions**: While appealing, the complexity of maintaining state and handling different payment types favored a microservices approach.
-
-## Consequences
-Choosing a microservices architecture will introduce operational overhead but it enables us to scale individual components as needed. It accommodates future integrations with third-party payment providers and allows teams to work independently on their respective services without impacting others.
-