Compare commits
No commits in common. "forge/SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3" and "main" have entirely different histories.
forge/SPRI
...
main
2 changed files with 0 additions and 18 deletions
|
|
@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
# SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Forge 이슈 작업 브랜치 `forge/SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
# Payment Boundary Decision Record
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Context
|
|
||||||
In developing the architecture for the payment processing system, our objective is to ensure a clear separation between the application logic and the payment gateways. This boundary will help maintain a clean architecture and allow for easier testing and maintainability.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Decision
|
|
||||||
We have decided to implement a port and adapter pattern where the payment gateway is accessed via a defined interface (port) rather than being directly referenced in the domain model. This ensures that our domain logic remains agnostic of the specific implementations of payment gateways.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Alternatives
|
|
||||||
1. Direct coupling with the payment gateway: This approach could lead to tight coupling and hinder maintainability and testability.
|
|
||||||
2. Abstracting payment logic into a service layer: While this maintains separation, it increases complexity and could introduce overhead.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Consequences
|
|
||||||
- By adhering to the port and adapter pattern, we ensure our domain model remains clean and focused on business logic.
|
|
||||||
- Changes in payment gateway implementations can be managed without affecting the domain logic, leading to improved agility.
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue