From f0aa1bad7e81457258592cbedce61e2c9193fa92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 03:29:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] forge: open work branch for SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3 --- .forge/SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .forge/SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3.md diff --git a/.forge/SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3.md b/.forge/SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1ed3abe --- /dev/null +++ b/.forge/SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3 + +Forge 이슈 작업 브랜치 `forge/SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844-attempt-3`. From 00c6800ea3beef83f6c34d13f631744bdbb83a22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 03:29:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] =?UTF-8?q?=EA=B2=B0=EC=A0=9C=20=EC=A0=84=ED=99=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EB=AA=A9=ED=91=9C=20=EC=95=84=ED=82=A4=ED=85=8D=EC=B2=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EC=A0=95=EC=9D=98=20(SPRING-ARC-VERIFIED-1783826844)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md diff --git a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e218e6c --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +# Payment Boundary Decision Record + +## Context +In developing the architecture for the payment processing system, our objective is to ensure a clear separation between the application logic and the payment gateways. This boundary will help maintain a clean architecture and allow for easier testing and maintainability. + +## Decision +We have decided to implement a port and adapter pattern where the payment gateway is accessed via a defined interface (port) rather than being directly referenced in the domain model. This ensures that our domain logic remains agnostic of the specific implementations of payment gateways. + +## Alternatives +1. Direct coupling with the payment gateway: This approach could lead to tight coupling and hinder maintainability and testability. +2. Abstracting payment logic into a service layer: While this maintains separation, it increases complexity and could introduce overhead. + +## Consequences +- By adhering to the port and adapter pattern, we ensure our domain model remains clean and focused on business logic. +- Changes in payment gateway implementations can be managed without affecting the domain logic, leading to improved agility. \ No newline at end of file