From 27d14d7874f35ba658d796b96faec5f69679f59d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 05:36:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] forge: open work branch for SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407-attempt-2-run-3684da5b842c --- .forge/SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407-attempt-2-run-3684da5b842c.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .forge/SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407-attempt-2-run-3684da5b842c.md diff --git a/.forge/SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407-attempt-2-run-3684da5b842c.md b/.forge/SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407-attempt-2-run-3684da5b842c.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fb4b6a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/.forge/SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407-attempt-2-run-3684da5b842c.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407-attempt-2-run-3684da5b842c + +Forge 이슈 작업 브랜치 `forge/SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407-attempt-2-run-3684da5b842c`. -- 2.49.1 From 9878258d3d66ca514fcbf2784acaf12bb5f81a01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 05:36:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] =?UTF-8?q?=EA=B2=B0=EC=A0=9C=20=EC=A0=84=ED=99=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EB=AA=A9=ED=91=9C=20=EC=95=84=ED=82=A4=ED=85=8D=EC=B2=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EC=A0=95=EC=9D=98=20(1/2)=20(1/2)=20(SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407?= =?UTF-8?q?)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md diff --git a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5f82ca6 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# ADR for Payment Boundary + +## Context +This document provides the Architectural Decision Record (ADR) for defining the payment boundary within the project's architecture. The objective is to create a clear demarcation of responsibilities related to payment processing, ensuring that all payment-related functionalities are encapsulated and modular. + +## Decision +We have decided to adopt a microservices architecture for the payment processing functionality. The payment service will handle all interactions related to payment transactions, including validation, processing, and integration with third-party payment providers. + +## Alternatives +1. **Monolithic Architecture**: We could have developed the payment processing functionality as a part of the existing monolithic application. However, this would lead to tight coupling and reduced scalability. +2. **Serverless Architecture**: Another alternative was to implement the payment service using serverless functions. This would provide ease of scaling but at the cost of increased complexity in managing state and transactions. + +## Consequences +By selecting a microservices architecture, we ensure scalability and flexibility in deploying updates to the payment service independently. However, this approach may introduce challenges related to inter-service communication and require robust monitoring and logging mechanisms to track payment transaction flows. \ No newline at end of file -- 2.49.1