결제 전환 목표 아키텍처 정의 (1/2) (1/2) (SPRING-ARC-RUN-1783834407)
All checks were successful
ci / test (pull_request) Successful in 13s
All checks were successful
ci / test (pull_request) Successful in 13s
This commit is contained in:
parent
27d14d7874
commit
9878258d3d
1 changed files with 14 additions and 0 deletions
14
docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md
Normal file
14
docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|||
# ADR for Payment Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
This document provides the Architectural Decision Record (ADR) for defining the payment boundary within the project's architecture. The objective is to create a clear demarcation of responsibilities related to payment processing, ensuring that all payment-related functionalities are encapsulated and modular.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
We have decided to adopt a microservices architecture for the payment processing functionality. The payment service will handle all interactions related to payment transactions, including validation, processing, and integration with third-party payment providers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives
|
||||
1. **Monolithic Architecture**: We could have developed the payment processing functionality as a part of the existing monolithic application. However, this would lead to tight coupling and reduced scalability.
|
||||
2. **Serverless Architecture**: Another alternative was to implement the payment service using serverless functions. This would provide ease of scaling but at the cost of increased complexity in managing state and transactions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
By selecting a microservices architecture, we ensure scalability and flexibility in deploying updates to the payment service independently. However, this approach may introduce challenges related to inter-service communication and require robust monitoring and logging mechanisms to track payment transaction flows.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue