forge-bot/spring-architecture-reference-1783832425
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 4 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Compare commits

base: forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-4
Branches Tags
forge-bot:main
forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-4
forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-3
forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-2
forge-bot:forge/iss-5046557b3d46-attempt-1
forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-1
forge-bot:forge/iss-6f8eac22f6f0-attempt-1
..
compare: forge-bot:main
Branches Tags
forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-4
forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-3
forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-2
forge-bot:main
forge-bot:forge/iss-5046557b3d46-attempt-1
forge-bot:forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-1
forge-bot:forge/iss-6f8eac22f6f0-attempt-1

No commits in common. "forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-4" and "main" have entirely different histories.
forge/SPRI ... main

2 changed files with 0 additions and 28 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
.forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-4.md
View file

@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
# SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-4
Forge 이슈 작업 브랜치 `forge/SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783832425-attempt-4`.

25
docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md
View file

@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
# Architecture Decision Record: Payment Boundary
## Context
In the process of defining a payment transition architecture, it is essential to delineate clear boundaries regarding payments. This includes how payments are processed, managed, and interacted with other services within the larger application ecosystem.
## Decision
The payment boundary will be established to segregate payment functionalities from other domains. This will facilitate clearer service contracts, promote scalability, and enhance maintainability. The boundaries defined are:
1. **Payment Processing** - Manage all transaction flows, including initiation, validation, and completion.
2. **Payment Storage** - Handle data persistence for transactions, ensuring compliance with security protocols.
3. **Payment Notifications** - Direct communication with users and systems regarding the status of transactions.
Additional services such as audits and reporting will be encapsulated within the payment context but operate on a separate service layer.
## Alternatives
- **Single Service**: All payment functionalities within one service.
- **Pros**: Simplicity in managing.
- **Cons**: Difficult to scale and maintain, especially with increased complexity.
- **Microservices**: Distributed payment functions.
- **Pros**: Improved separation of concerns, easier to manage separately.
- **Cons**: Increased complexity in inter-service communication.
The decision leans towards microservices for better scalability and maintainability of the payment system.
## Consequences
Implementing a microservices approach to the payment boundary means that each service can be scaled independently, enhancing performance. However, it also requires robust inter-service communication strategies and potentially higher operational overhead due to multiple service deployments.