From 7a4656a3a97c28ad84445e495f896c324c3c2c8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 05:05:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?=EA=B2=B0=EC=A0=9C=20=EC=A0=84=ED=99=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EB=AA=A9=ED=91=9C=20=EC=95=84=ED=82=A4=ED=85=8D=EC=B2=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EC=A0=95=EC=9D=98=20(1/2)=20(1/2)=20(SPRING-ARC-REFERENCE-1783?= =?UTF-8?q?832425)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md diff --git a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6f11c74 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +# Architecture Decision Record: Payment Boundary + +## Context +In the process of defining a payment transition architecture, it is essential to delineate clear boundaries regarding payments. This includes how payments are processed, managed, and interacted with other services within the larger application ecosystem. + +## Decision +The payment boundary will be established to segregate payment functionalities from other domains. This will facilitate clearer service contracts, promote scalability, and enhance maintainability. The boundaries defined are: +1. **Payment Processing** - Manage all transaction flows, including initiation, validation, and completion. +2. **Payment Storage** - Handle data persistence for transactions, ensuring compliance with security protocols. +3. **Payment Notifications** - Direct communication with users and systems regarding the status of transactions. + +Additional services such as audits and reporting will be encapsulated within the payment context but operate on a separate service layer. + +## Alternatives +- **Single Service**: All payment functionalities within one service. + - **Pros**: Simplicity in managing. + - **Cons**: Difficult to scale and maintain, especially with increased complexity. +- **Microservices**: Distributed payment functions. + - **Pros**: Improved separation of concerns, easier to manage separately. + - **Cons**: Increased complexity in inter-service communication. + +The decision leans towards microservices for better scalability and maintainability of the payment system. + +## Consequences +Implementing a microservices approach to the payment boundary means that each service can be scaled independently, enhancing performance. However, it also requires robust inter-service communication strategies and potentially higher operational overhead due to multiple service deployments. \ No newline at end of file