From b141cac6bcc374b3869887175d4d4bd46d4437ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:40:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] forge: open work branch for SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207-attempt-2 --- .forge/SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207-attempt-2.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .forge/SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207-attempt-2.md diff --git a/.forge/SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207-attempt-2.md b/.forge/SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207-attempt-2.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3523128 --- /dev/null +++ b/.forge/SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207-attempt-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207-attempt-2 + +Forge 이슈 작업 브랜치 `forge/SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207-attempt-2`. From 73f993754ff3e34f760f426da297d6d9d86f6fa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:41:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] =?UTF-8?q?=EA=B2=B0=EC=A0=9C=20=EC=A0=84=ED=99=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EB=AA=A9=ED=91=9C=20=EC=95=84=ED=82=A4=ED=85=8D=EC=B2=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EC=A0=95=EC=9D=98=20(SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md diff --git a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ab618a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +# Architectural Decision Record: Payment Boundary + +## Context +이 아키텍처 결정은 결제 시스템의 경계를 정의하고, 결제 전환 목표를 달성하기 위한 지역 및 외부 시스템과의 상호 작용을 명확히 하기 위해 작성되었습니다. 결제는 여러 외부 시스템과 통합될 필요가 있으며, 그에 따라 내부 도메인 로직이 이들 시스템과 어떻게 상호 작용하는지를 정의합니다. + +## Decision +결제 시스템은 외부 결제 게이트웨이를 포트 인터페이스로 묶고, 도메인에서 어댑터를 직접 참조하지 않습니다. 이러한 구조는 결제 도메인 로직과 외부 시스템 간의 결합도를 낮추고, 테스트 가능성을 높입니다. + +## Alternatives +1. **직접 호출**: 외부 결제 시스템의 API를 도메인에서 직접 호출하는 것. + - *장점*: 단순하고 빠른 구현. + - *단점*: 결합도가 높아지고 유지 보수가 어려워짐. +2. **서비스 레이어 도입**: 결제 로직을 서비스 레이어로 분리하여 모든 결제 요청을 처리. + - *장점*: 결합도 감소 및 더 나은 테스트 가능성. + - *단점*: 복잡성 증가. + +## Consequences +결제 시스템의 경계를 명확히 하여, 외부 시스템과의 상호작용이 관리되고, 내부 도메인 로직의 독립성이 강화됩니다. 그러나 서비스 간의 호출이 증가할 수 있어, 성능에 부정적인 영향이 있을 수 있습니다. \ No newline at end of file From 64d285762ecbb5340b02e8a99d9ac9596338871d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:42:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] =?UTF-8?q?=EA=B2=B0=EC=A0=9C=20=EC=A0=84=ED=99=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EB=AA=A9=ED=91=9C=20=EC=95=84=ED=82=A4=ED=85=8D=EC=B2=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EC=A0=95=EC=9D=98=20(1/2)=20(SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-1783831207)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md index ab618a7..afa66cb 100644 --- a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md +++ b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ -# Architectural Decision Record: Payment Boundary +# Decision Record: Payment Boundary ## Context -이 아키텍처 결정은 결제 시스템의 경계를 정의하고, 결제 전환 목표를 달성하기 위한 지역 및 외부 시스템과의 상호 작용을 명확히 하기 위해 작성되었습니다. 결제는 여러 외부 시스템과 통합될 필요가 있으며, 그에 따라 내부 도메인 로직이 이들 시스템과 어떻게 상호 작용하는지를 정의합니다. +We need to define clear boundaries around the payment processing functionality in our system to ensure maintainability, separation of concerns, and adherence to clean architecture principles. The system will interface with external payment gateways, which introduces potential risks and complexities. ## Decision -결제 시스템은 외부 결제 게이트웨이를 포트 인터페이스로 묶고, 도메인에서 어댑터를 직접 참조하지 않습니다. 이러한 구조는 결제 도메인 로직과 외부 시스템 간의 결합도를 낮추고, 테스트 가능성을 높입니다. +We have decided to isolate the payment gateway integration behind a port interface, allowing the domain logic to remain agnostic of the actual payment gateway being used. This means that the domain layer will define interfaces (ports) for payment interactions, while the implementation (adapters) will handle specific payment methods (e.g., credit card, PayPal, etc.). ## Alternatives -1. **직접 호출**: 외부 결제 시스템의 API를 도메인에서 직접 호출하는 것. - - *장점*: 단순하고 빠른 구현. - - *단점*: 결합도가 높아지고 유지 보수가 어려워짐. -2. **서비스 레이어 도입**: 결제 로직을 서비스 레이어로 분리하여 모든 결제 요청을 처리. - - *장점*: 결합도 감소 및 더 나은 테스트 가능성. - - *단점*: 복잡성 증가. +1. **Direct Integration**: Integrate the payment gateway directly within the domain layer. + - **Consequences**: This would tightly couple the domain logic with specific payment gateways, making the system harder to maintain and adapt to changes in payment providers. + +2. **Use of Service Layer**: Introduce a service layer that manages payment operations. + - **Consequences**: While this adds a layer of abstraction, it does not solve the core issue of the domain being aware of payment details. This approach may complicate the architecture without clear benefits. ## Consequences -결제 시스템의 경계를 명확히 하여, 외부 시스템과의 상호작용이 관리되고, 내부 도메인 로직의 독립성이 강화됩니다. 그러나 서비스 간의 호출이 증가할 수 있어, 성능에 부정적인 영향이 있을 수 있습니다. \ No newline at end of file +- By isolating the payment gateway integrations through a port interface, we ensure that business logic remains clean and focused on core functionalities, enabling easier testing, adaptation, and maintenance in the future. +- This architecture choice facilitates ease of switching payment providers with minimal impact on the core domain logic. \ No newline at end of file From 5dd7302aa9a1accc5ce4a366d7d3c83f16f83745 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:42:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] forge: open work branch for iss-8fd82b653bff-attempt-1 --- .forge/iss-8fd82b653bff-attempt-1.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .forge/iss-8fd82b653bff-attempt-1.md diff --git a/.forge/iss-8fd82b653bff-attempt-1.md b/.forge/iss-8fd82b653bff-attempt-1.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..642c13c --- /dev/null +++ b/.forge/iss-8fd82b653bff-attempt-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# iss-8fd82b653bff-attempt-1 + +Forge 이슈 작업 브랜치 `forge/iss-8fd82b653bff-attempt-1`. From 0541f0a9899241e8a1c0c0cebe0d69584d3b1274 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:43:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] =?UTF-8?q?=EA=B2=B0=EC=A0=9C=20=EC=A0=84=ED=99=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EB=AA=A9=ED=91=9C=20=EC=95=84=ED=82=A4=ED=85=8D=EC=B2=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EC=A0=95=EC=9D=98=20(1/2)=20(2/2)=20(iss-8fd82b653bff)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/architecture/package-map.md | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/architecture/package-map.md diff --git a/docs/architecture/package-map.md b/docs/architecture/package-map.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0cfee4d --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/architecture/package-map.md @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +# Package Map + +| Package | Responsibility | Forbidden Dependencies | +|----------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| controller | Handle HTTP requests and responses | domain | +| service | Business logic and transaction management | domain, integration | +| repository | Data access and retrieval | service | +| domain | Core domain logic and entities | controller, service, repository | +| integration | External service communication | service | \ No newline at end of file From 6a5098ebe17b9b09b6b64f3a914b2f6cc13ca48d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:44:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] =?UTF-8?q?=EA=B2=B0=EC=A0=9C=20=EC=A0=84=ED=99=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EB=AA=A9=ED=91=9C=20=EC=95=84=ED=82=A4=ED=85=8D=EC=B2=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EC=A0=95=EC=9D=98=20(1/2)=20(1/2)=20(SPRING-ARC-QUALITY-178383?= =?UTF-8?q?1207)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md | 35 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md index afa66cb..a552851 100644 --- a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md +++ b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md @@ -1,18 +1,35 @@ -# Decision Record: Payment Boundary +# ADR for Payment Boundary Definition ## Context -We need to define clear boundaries around the payment processing functionality in our system to ensure maintainability, separation of concerns, and adherence to clean architecture principles. The system will interface with external payment gateways, which introduces potential risks and complexities. + +In the payment processing system, clarity and delineation of boundaries are critical for ensuring security, maintainability, and scalability. Understanding the interactions between different components that handle payment transactions will help manage risks associated with payment data and integrations with external systems. + +The current system lacks a well-defined architecture for its payment processing boundaries. This has led to difficulties in isolating payment-related components, enforcing security measures, and integrating with third-party payment providers. ## Decision -We have decided to isolate the payment gateway integration behind a port interface, allowing the domain logic to remain agnostic of the actual payment gateway being used. This means that the domain layer will define interfaces (ports) for payment interactions, while the implementation (adapters) will handle specific payment methods (e.g., credit card, PayPal, etc.). + +1. **Establish Clear Payment Boundaries**: + - Define a dedicated Payment Service responsible for handling all payment transactions. + - Separate the payment logic from other business logic to adhere to the single responsibility principle. + - The Payment Service will interact with external payment gateways, ensuring that sensitive payment data remains secure and encapsulated. + +2. **Adopt Event-Driven Architecture**: + - Introduce an event bus for communication between the Payment Service and other components (e.g., Order Service, Notification Service). This will allow for decoupled interactions and better scalability. + - Utilize events such as `PaymentProcessed`, `PaymentFailed`, and `RefundProcessed` to notify other services about payment outcomes. + +3. **Implement Strong Authentication and Authorization**: + - All access to the Payment Service must go through an authentication layer, verifying the identity and permissions of the calling service. + - Enforce strict access controls to sensitive payment processing endpoints. ## Alternatives -1. **Direct Integration**: Integrate the payment gateway directly within the domain layer. - - **Consequences**: This would tightly couple the domain logic with specific payment gateways, making the system harder to maintain and adapt to changes in payment providers. -2. **Use of Service Layer**: Introduce a service layer that manages payment operations. - - **Consequences**: While this adds a layer of abstraction, it does not solve the core issue of the domain being aware of payment details. This approach may complicate the architecture without clear benefits. +- **Tightly Coupled Monolithic Approach**: Keeping the payment logic embedded within a monolithic application, which would simplify communications at the cost of flexibility and security. Not recommended due to increased risk and reduced scalability. +- **Using Microservices Without Boundaries**: Deploying multiple microservices interacting directly with each other without a clear Payment Service, leading to potential security vulnerabilities and a tangled codebase. Not recommended due to maintainability concerns. ## Consequences -- By isolating the payment gateway integrations through a port interface, we ensure that business logic remains clean and focused on core functionalities, enabling easier testing, adaptation, and maintenance in the future. -- This architecture choice facilitates ease of switching payment providers with minimal impact on the core domain logic. \ No newline at end of file + +Implementing these boundaries will lead to: +- Increased security around payment processing, protecting sensitive customer data. +- Improved maintainability, as the payment logic is separate from other business functionalities. +- Greater scalability, with an event-driven model allowing for easier integration of additional services as needed. +- Enhanced resilience through decoupling, allowing individual services to scale and handle failures independently. \ No newline at end of file