From 697db8ffcaf4e7407e6ccd690f306634f0993f13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: forge-bot Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:11:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?=EA=B2=B0=EC=A0=9C=20=EC=A0=84=ED=99=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EB=AA=A9=ED=91=9C=20=EC=95=84=ED=82=A4=ED=85=8D=EC=B2=98=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=EC=A0=95=EC=9D=98=20(SPRING-ARC-DONE-1783829491)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md diff --git a/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7c9e7ee --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/architecture/adr-payment-boundary.md @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# ADR for Payment Boundary + +## Context +In developing a payment processing system, defining clear boundaries between various components is critical for maintaining a robust architecture. This delineation ensures that payment interactions can evolve independently and that the overall system remains resilient against failures. + +## Decision +We have decided to implement a domain-driven design where the payment processing logic resides within the domain layer, while integration with external payment gateways will occur via an adapter pattern, ensuring that the domain is insulated from external dependencies. + +## Alternatives +1. **Tight Coupling with External Service**: Directly invoking external payment services from the domain layer, leading to increased risk of failure. +2. **Service Layer Gateway**: Using a service layer to aggregate responses but still indirectly coupling the domain to the external service. + +## Consequences +By using an adapter pattern, the domain can adapt to different payment gateways without affecting other parts of the system. This promotes better maintainability and flexibility in the payment processing architecture. \ No newline at end of file